Economic Valuation of Bukit Kaba Nature Tourism Park (NTP): Travel Cost Method-Poisson Regression, Bengkulu Indonesia



Abstract Views
367

Downloads
259

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 6, 2023
Published Jun 6, 2023
10.24018/ejdevelop.2023.3.3.271

Abstract viewed = 367 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The objective of this research is to determine the economic value of the Bukit Kaba NTP tourist attraction using Travel Cost Method, and to identify the determinants of the frequency of tourist visits to Bukit Kaba NTP. This research used a quantitative descriptive method with the research sample being Tourists to Bukit Kaba NTP in 2022. This research using Poisson regression as an analytical tool and to determine the economic value of the Bukit Kaba NTP are using the Travel Cost Method (TCM). This research consists of 1 dependent variable, it frequency of tourist visits and 5 independent variables consisting of travel cost, Income, perception of the environmental quality, perception of the imposition of entrance retribution tariff, travelled distance. This research used Primary data obtained from questionnaires distributed to Bukit Kaba NTP tourists, namely as many as 100 respondents. The results showed that only the variables of perception of the environmental quality and travelled distance had a significant effect on the frequency of tourist visits of Bukit Kaba NTP, Whereas the variables of travel cost, income, and perception of the imposition of entrance retribution tariff of the Bukit Kaba NTP area did not affect the frequency of visits. In this Poisson regression model, a Nagelkerke R Square value of 0,22 is obtained. These results showed that the ability of the independent variable to explain the dependent variable was 0,22 or 22 percent, Whereas 78 percent was explained outside the research variable. Furthermore, based on the Travel Cost Method, the economic value of the Bukit Kaba NTP tourist area is IDR 215.521.346.820 with an average consumer surplus is IDR 12.645.740. So, in order to increase Non-Tax State Revenue (NTSR), the Rejang Lebong Regency Government can increase entrance retribution tariff Bukit Kaba NTP because it is still in accordance with the willingness to pay the tourists.
Keywords: Frequency of Visits Travel Cost Income Perception of the Environmental Quality Perception of the Imposition of Entrance Retribution Tariff Travelled Distance

References

  1. Uthman, O. (2007). Environmental factors, neighbourhood deprivation, and under-five mortality in Nigeria: an exploratory spatial data analysis. The Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology, 9(1), 1–9.
     Google Scholar
  2. Andina, S.A., & Aliyah, I. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Wisatawan Dalam Mengunjungi Wisata Budaya Candi Borobudur. Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, 22(3), 27-38.
     Google Scholar
  3. Anna, Z., & Saputra, D. S. (2017). Economic Valuation Of Whale Shark Tourism in Cenderawasih Bay National Park, Papua Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 18(3), 1026–1034.
     Google Scholar
  4. Badar, H. (2013). Estimasi Nilai Ekonomi Wisata Warisan Budaya Candi Borobudur, Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 14(1), 80-89.
     Google Scholar
  5. Budi, A. & Santosa, P. B. (2013). Analisis Permintaan Obyek Wisata Masjid Agung Semarang. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 2(2), 1-15.
     Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Socienty Monograph No.30. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  7. Djijono. (2002). Valuasi Ekonomi Menggunakan Metode Travel Cost Taman Wisata Hutan di Taman Hutan Wan Abdul Rahman, Provinsi Lampung. Makalah Pengantar Falsafah Sains. Institute pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
     Google Scholar
  8. Fauzi, A. (2006). Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Gramedia: Jakarta.
     Google Scholar
  9. Field, B. C. (2001). Environmental Economics: Anintroduction. McGraw Hill.
     Google Scholar
  10. Furqony, M. I., & Fafurida, (2017). Valuation and Development Strategy of Mawar Basecamp in Ungaran Mountain Through Individual Travel Cost Approach. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 6(4), 428-435.
     Google Scholar
  11. Garrod, G., & Willis, K. G. (2000). Economic Valuation Of The Environment: Methods And Case Studies. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
     Google Scholar
  12. Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Ke-4. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
     Google Scholar
  13. Haab,T.C., & McConnell, K.E. (2002). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: the Econometrics Of Non-Market Valuation. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hutahayan, D., & Pratidina, H. (2018). Pesona Wisata Bukit Kaba. BKSDA Bengkulu : Bengkulu.
     Google Scholar
  15. Khoirudin, R., & Khasanah, U. (2018). Valuasi Ekonomi Objek Wisata Pantai Parangtritis, Bantul Yogyakarta Economic Valuation of Parangtritis Beach, Bantul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 18(2), 152–166.
     Google Scholar
  16. Lakuhati, J. R., Pangemanan, P. A., & Pakasi, C.B.D (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kunjungan Wisatawan ke Kawasan Ekowisata di Desa Bahoi Kecamatan Likupang Barat Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Agri-Sosio Ekonomi Unsrat.
     Google Scholar
  17. Lestari, R., & Dewanti, D.S. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kunjungan Wisata di Objek Wisata Alam Kalibiru Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta. Journal of Economics Research and Social Sciences, 3(2), 134-139.
     Google Scholar
  18. Lipton, D. W., Wellman, K., Sheifer, I., & Weiher, R. (1995). Economic valuation of natural resources: a handbook for coastal resource policymakers. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series, 5. Silver Spring, MD: Coastal Ocean Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Diakses dari http://aquaticcommons.org/14656/. Tanggal Akses 3 Mei 2019.
     Google Scholar
  19. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.A. (1998). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.) Chapman and Hall/CRC London.
     Google Scholar
  20. Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. (2010). Intermediate micro economics and its application. 11th Edition. Mason:South-Western Cengage Learning.
     Google Scholar
  21. Prasetyo, D., Barika, B., Septriani, S., & Armelly, A. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Belanja Langsung, Belanja Tidak Langsung dan Jumlah Penduduk Terhadap Struktur Ekonomi Primer Provinsi Bengkulu. WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(2), 158-166.
     Google Scholar
  22. Pasaribu, E., Septriani, S., Bernadin, B., & Febriani, R. E. (2021). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Kota Bengkulu: Pendekatan Derajat Desentralisasi Fiskal. Akuntabilitas, 15(1), 137-154.
     Google Scholar
  23. Pratama, A. A. (2016). Valuasi Ekonomi Pariwisata Dengan Metode Biaya Perjalanan (Travel Cost Method) di Pantai Nglambor Gunung Kidul. Skripsi: Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pramudhito, A. (2010). Aplikasi Biaya Perjalanan (Travel Cost) PAD a Wisata Alam Studi Kasus Air Terjun Jumog kabupaten Karanganyar. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakata.
     Google Scholar
  25. Rahardjo, M. (2003). Nilai Guna Lingkungan Konservasi Waduk Cengklik di Kabupaten Boyolali. Surakarta: Tesis Universitas Sebelas Maret. Tidak dipublikasikan.
     Google Scholar
  26. Sari, N. P. 2016. Valuasi Ekonomi Taman Rekreasi Kebon Rojo Kota Blitar. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada.
     Google Scholar
  27. Septriani, S., Armelly, A., Ekaputri, R. A., & Pasaribu, E. (2020). Analisis Fenomena Flypaper Effect Pada Kinerja Keuangan Kota Bengkulu. Akuntabilitas, 14(1), 33-56.
     Google Scholar
  28. Septriani, S. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Dana Perimbangan dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Terhadap Belanja Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Bengkulu. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(3), 884-894.
     Google Scholar
  29. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D). Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
     Google Scholar
  30. Tazkia, F. H. (2012). Analisis Permintaan Obyek Wisata Pemandian Air Panas Kalianget, Kabupaten Wonosobo dengan Pendekatan Travel Cost. Jurnal Ekonomi, 1(1).
     Google Scholar
  31. Undang-Undang RI Nomor 9 Tahun 1990 Tentang Kepariwisataan.
     Google Scholar
  32. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan.
     Google Scholar
  33. Wardani. (2016). Membedah Teori Sosiologi. Studi Insania, 4(1), 19-38.
     Google Scholar