##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study was researched on the need to establish the factors influencing the accessibility of social services in informal settlements in the Kasarani sub-county, Kenya. The Kasarani sub-county in Kenya acted as the place for conducting this study. The caregivers of children with disabilities, stakeholders working with children with disabilities, Funding agencies targeting children with disabilities, and community-based organizations working with children with disabilities in the informal settlement areas acted as the target population. The target sample of 200 was selected from a population of 2,000 individuals. Data collection was performed through a questionnaire. Data coding and analysis were performed through SPSS and presented. Descriptive and regression analysis was used in the analysis of the data. The data was summarized using tables, figures, and the regression model. The study established that the participation of stakeholders influences the accessibility of social services for children with disabilities in the Kasarani sub-county. The study further found that funding influences the accessibility of social services for children with disabilities in the Kasarani sub-county. Also, it found that a unit increase in the capacity of caregivers leads to an increase in the accessibility of Social Services in the informal settlement. Based on the findings, this study recommended that more homes should be established in the informal settlements in the country to help those children with disabilities, and the government, as a policy intervention, should review the funding of homecare programs by fully extending the support to all local community organizations in informal settlements.

References

  1. Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  2. APDK. (1999). Quarterly report of 1999 (Report). Nairobi: Association for the Physically Disabled Person of Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
     Google Scholar
  4. Clark, D. O. (1996). The effect of walking on lower body disability among older Blacks and Whites. American Journal of Public
     Google Scholar
  5. Health, 86, 57-6
     Google Scholar
  6. Courtney-Long, E. A., Carroll, D. D., Zhang, Q. C., Stevens, A. C., Griffin-Blake, S., Armour, B. S., & Campbell, V. A. (2015). Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults — United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 64(29), 777783. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6429a2.
     Google Scholar
  7. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
     Google Scholar
  8. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
     Google Scholar
  9. Guralnik, J. M., LaCroix, A. Z., Branch, L. G., Kasl, S. V., & Wallace, R. B. (1991). Morbidity and disability in older persons in the years prior to death. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 443447.
     Google Scholar
  10. Guralnik, J. M., LaCroix, A. Z., Abbott, R. D., Berkman, L. F., Satterfield, S., Evans, D. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1993). Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(8), 845857.
     Google Scholar
  11. Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (1994). Strategic management of organizations and stakeholders. St. Paul, MN: West.
     Google Scholar
  12. KeNADA. (2009). 2009 Kenya population and housing census. Kenya National Data Archive (KeNADA).
     Google Scholar
  13. KNCHR. (2014). From norm to practice: A status report on implementation of the rights of persons with disabilities in Kenya. Kenya Nairobi: National Commission on Human Rights. https://www.knchr.org/Portals/0/Reports/Disability%20Report.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kothari, C.R (2005)., Quantitative Techniques, 2nd ed., New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The communist manifesto. New York: Monthly Review Press.
     Google Scholar
  16. Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: ACT Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Nyamu Consultants. (2013). NIP outcome survey 2013: Area strategic plan outcomes. Dr. Nyamu Consultants and Co.
     Google Scholar
  18. Okoro, C. A., Hollis, N. D., Cyrus, A. C., & Griffin-Blake, S. (2018). Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults—United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(32), 882887.
     Google Scholar
  19. Paul, S., Rafal, M., & Houtenville, A. (2021). Annual disability statistics compendium: 2021. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.
     Google Scholar
  20. Paul, S., Rogers, S., Bach, S., & Houtenville, A. (2023). Annual disability statistics compendium: 2023. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.
     Google Scholar
  21. Republic of Kenya. (2010). Constitution of Kenya, 2010. http://kenyalaw.org/lex/actview.xql?actid=Const2010.
     Google Scholar
  22. UNDESA. (2022). Factsheet on persons with disabilities. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/factsheet-on-persons-with-disabilities.html.
     Google Scholar
  23. World Bank. (1975). Rural development: Sector policy paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1975/02/1561278/rural-development.
     Google Scholar
  24. WHO. (2023). Disability. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health.
     Google Scholar
  25. Worldometer. (n.d.). Current world population. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/.
     Google Scholar
  26. Zhao, G., Okoro, C. A., Hsia, J., Garvin, W. S., & Town, M. (2019). Prevalence of disability and disability types by urban–rural county classification—U.S., 2016. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(6), 749–756.
     Google Scholar